It used to be the song "money changes everything" by Cyndi Lauper. But now it's the all encompassing issue of dangerous
climate change shaking up conventional wisdom. And DCC itself is a subset of the even greater unifying reality of ecology - that is simply everything alive is connected. Whether you believe God created that circumstance and thus a sacred obligation for stewardship, or by some other process, it's still all connected.
Never has moral credibility on matters of ecological sustainability been at more
of a premium in our 15 year downshifting 'career' as an environmental reformist/lobbyist.
Crikey.com.au, very
commited to the creative destruction of capitalism and thus market forces wrote this about climate influenced drought today,
quoting approvingly in turn editorial of the conservative, pro fossil fuel The Australian newspaper, in turn echoing
community medi The Big Issue March 2007 edition above. The "enlightened" irony
of the text will become apparent, and we don't actually mean that in such a judgemental way. We really are in scary unchartered
waters for western civilisation and this writer for one is scared, for real:
The trouble with drought relief is that it props up unviable farms. The Australian recognises the terrible pressure
a drought puts on individuals, families and communities, but drought assistance is a government intervention and as with any
government intervention, it distorts the market. So long as farmers in marginal agricultural enterprises know that the Government
will bail them out, they defer the difficult decision to cut their losses and leave the land. Whereas other unviable industries
go to the wall in the face of changing conditions, there is an assumption that farmers should not be allowed
to go broke, and if they do, they should be given assistance to exit the industry. When droughts break, as the always do,
new entrants go in, enjoying the good times and then expecting a handout when the next drought hits.
Sadly, the lead up to a federal election is no time to expect rational economic decisions, but this is what is required.
Handouts to unviable farms are a drain on the public purse and on scarce resources such as water, and by putting subsidised
products in the market, they make it harder for viable farms to survive. [bold added]
Both major parties are very involved and engaged now
on DCC. Motivated by a fear of losing power, certainly, this election season. Fear too of a collective adverse judgment by
industry sectors, the nation, the human species driven by the imperative of self preservation? Fear of failure their
whole public policy career? Fear of honest science? Fear for the future, certainly. Fear for
mother earth maybe. The fear is in their heart like it is in this writer's too.
Last Monday the Howard federal govt did a "triple backflip" or some such description over endorsing a 15% renewable
energy target for Australia as per the front page stories: This was such a change Clement cartooned today on the feature Herald
space:
We particularly liked this visual metaphor of the
coin collectors in koala suit having been part of the The Wilderness Society outreach machine in embyronic form in 1992-4,
our role giving campaign briefings to the growing squadron of 'koalas', which started with just one way brave soul way
back when. These days it's more likely to be polar bear suits, not koalas.
Courage. It's a topic that features in a lovely essay
in The Australian [newspaper] Literary Review early this month "Show some ticker" by Maria Tumarkin
at page 10 5th Sept 07. The thesis is that courage is needed in our mundane lives. This is exactly our experience of serious
achievement in life. To overcome serious problems like dangerous climate change. Fear won't cut it, its courage we need at
every level of society.
Because we are coming from a very low base of poor
sustainability even as the awareness of the very serious impications of DCC reach the upper industry echeleons: See this
graphic from p37, The Weekend Australian by John Durie previously Australian Financial Review, with
circle around comparatively enlightened captains of industry directly on DCC or related water problems:
But even as federal govt, and industry, and even the
military industrial complex (Defence forces join the battle against global warming Emiko Terazono | September 11, 2007, and here AM - Police Commissioner enters climate change debate) buy into the myriad aspects of DCC the state of confused public policy is clear to see, especially this election
season.
Here are only some of the startling examples of this
chaos of the catchup crowd formerly such sure critics of the green movement these many decades:
1. on p14 22-23rd Sept 2007 The Australian
this federal govt advert
and juxtaposed very next page 15 this privately funded
advert for a pulp mill that will kill millions of tonnes of natural forest carbon storage, a pulp mill the federal govt supports
say The Greens Howard shepherding Gay’s pulp mill – Brown
2. In a similar push me pull you, half arse coordination
of environmental policy in NSW the state government is being sued for logging red gum natural forest while the Victorian
Govt is protecting them: Battle to save river red gums for grey babblers - Environment ...
3. The confusion of the federal govt is attracting
high profile tv advertising on AFL grand final day by ALP friendly (ie Evan Thorley MP) highly effective cyber lobby
group Get Up as here
4. But its not just the govt that's confused. Peter
Garrett MP as lead singer/Opposition Environment Minister is attracting similar claims of being a phoney: A man of practical passions by sharp tool John Lyons formerly Ch9.
5. Indeed the ALP are being attacked for cute green
wedge politics by this writer (see first previous story re CFMEU election double talk) as per the close NSW 1995 election
under Bob Carr, with Big Meeja's Janet Albrechtsen picking up the theme today in The Australian here
Climate promises so much hot air Janet Albrechtsen KEVIN Rudd and Wayne Swan know visions of a clean, green tomorrow are just election flim-flam.
6. As the insurance industry continues to actuarialise
'37% increase in insured losses in the next decade' at p11 Resources column, hidden away in the Careers section of The
Australian 22 Sept 2007 sourced to Bloomberg (possibly offline).
Annual insured losses from catastrophes such as
floods and hurricanes may jump to $41 billion a year in 2010-2019, up from $30 billion a year in 2000-2006, and less than
$5 billion before 1989, Munich based Allianz said in a report released in Sydney. Total losses in any one year may be
as much as $400 billion, syas Clement Booth, a member of the management board.
We find big business going full throttle to expand
fossil fuel production as here in this advertising supplement in The Australian last weekend
These big advertising driven supplements that The
Australian specialises in goes a long way to explaining why their editorial lambasted the Howard Govt's belated call
for 15% renewable energy target the very same day they reported the more progressive policy on their front page. The editorial
is here in true smart alec form
Howard catches the greenhouse wind CLEAN power target compounds reward for inefficiency.
while scrupulously avoiding any declaration of financial
conflict of interest.
7.
Other perverse ripple effects into the politics of
the nation are spreading out now too. We have intellectually gifted black politicians like Noel Pearson allegedly kept
in the fat paddock too long, who want more economic empowerment for suffering community, attacking green groups like
The Wilderness Society for meddling in his grand politicking. Meanwhile this same TWS is trying to keep living carbon
storage in the ground to save the same black owned land from being destroyed by rising sea levels. And the tension is all
because this Howard federal Govt broke its election promise of $40M funding in 1996 and 1998 for Cape York. The whole grim
bonfire of the 'moral vanities' black and white is captured in The Good Weekend 22-23 Sept 2007.
And Pearson (like Mick Kelty as chief of the Austalian
Federal Police reported elsewhere here on SAM news blog) is pushing Coalition and ALP buttons alternatively just in case
one or other wins: Compare this pro ALP Rudd piece by Pearson here
Rudd's reality started with Mundine | NEWS.com.au
and footage flattering rival Govt minister Mal
Brough recently on the 7.30 Report
20/09/2007 - Indigenous leader signs 99-year land lease to Govt
..........................
There is more than enough confusion, existential angst
and cause for reflection in all of this DCC for our own society let alone western civilisation.
And this article hasn't even tried to traverse the
reality of increased mega bushfire risk, and the ferocious real politik of that coming into this federal election summer, as scientists tell us yes it is climate driven danger Scientists predict frightening future under global warming and here New species of fire monster heading our way
BUSHFIRES that burn so hot they cannot be controlled
are likely to occur much more frequently in Sydney in the years to come, razing bushland, leaving property more susceptible
to flooding and threatening water supplies, new research indicates.
Who is best to lead us foward in such fraught times?
And how are we best to conduct our national affairs. There are critical concerns being expressed by clever experienced people
in the Big Meeja
* that Howard is more a politician than a leader (see
Homo politicus by George Megalogenis Australian Literary Review p6 5th Sept 07)
* that information flow is not what it should
be: Loosen curbs on our liberty John Hartigan | September 08, 2007 and Careful, he might hear you - National - smh.com.au by David Marr and Matthew Moore here FoI editor at Fairfax PM's election act offers no end to the secrecy
*we mentioned the essay on courage in mundane daily
life above and similarly the exhortation of public intellectuals to do their work with gusto
Let's resist the forces of ignorancePublic intellectuals should not remain silent in
the face of an assault on reason and our liberties, argues Barry Jones | September 05, 2007
At least within limits, ie avoiding the n word as Gerard Henderson puts it, certain as he is Australia has never been pre fascist from his white male middle class high access
perch, and to suggest such displays "a superficial understanding of this nation". Yeah Gerard but how would
a Muslim or an Aborigine (or both) describe our/their nation? A nation that doesn't respect their millenia of history
and culture?
Especially with Mick Kelty AFP chief the same
page of the Henderson article urging pre-emptive "Prevention is better than crime" mayne even for thought crime as in Orwell's 1984? Got to get your mind right Luke?
Funny how Henderson enjoys the hyperbole of others
but misses this ultra right howler from Frank Devine in his selective (?) roundup of inappropriate extreme Nazi metaphors
-
"Osama....the Paul Keating of international terrorism"
p13 The Australian 21/9/07 which cutely has been sanitsied on the web as
What was Osama on about? Frank Devine | September 21, 2007
* courage is what you really need in the public
intellectual sphere. Chris Masters thinks the ABC is doing a bit of pre emptive buckling despite being successfully sued by
Tim Priest it seems Legal threats have ABC cowering: top reporter | NEWS.com.au. Ironic as it was the same newspaper carrying that report that went yet another sledge of ABC Media Watch recently
perhaps to scare them off the trail of a good story Column sparks Media Watch pursuit Caroline Overington | September 24, 2007
But hopefully not as much courage as in Russia under
Putin where journalists are regularly knocked off: Dead funny guy, that Putin COMMENT: Greg Sheridan | September 22, 2007
One person who doesn't lack intellectual courage is
the adorable Elizabeth Farrelly (who perhaps like this writer has a morbid voyeuristic curiousity?) at the demise of robust democracy in Sydney, NSW telling it like it is, both looking and averting eyes at the shlock slasher movie horror tone of it all.
Certainly our democracy and our civil norms are being
tested by climate change and it's anyone's guess how it will all end up. To be honest this writer is not very optimistic.
And we note serious journalists are starting to put that very question to serious successful scientists starting
to hedge their answers much like the beginings of WW2 or the Cold War. We've never been here before.
If you really listen you can hear the fear in their
heart too.