|
Appendix B Note: The following is a cut and paste of the text of a PDF file which was found Jan 26, 27th and 28th
at this Dept of Planning website address (following) implying it was deceptively published from early December 2007 or
nearly 2 months, ongoing: In particular embedded URL of summary of the environmental assessment is http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/asp/pdf/06_0104_summary_of_the_ea_for_dop.pdf [Text copy follows verifying text of DOP PDF web version of EA summary] PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Project Environmental Assessment Summary of the Environmental Assessment PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
1 Summary of the Environmental Assessment Introduction The Environmental Assessment (EA) has been
prepared to accompany a development application by PF Formation for a change
to their operations at the Maroota, Baulkham Hills. Although the proposal
comprises a number of changes to the current approval, it is treated as a new
development which would supersede it. This would require the surrender of the existing consent
at an agreed time following the receipt of approval for the present application. The site is located approximately 50 kilometres
to the north-west of the Sydney Central Business District and about eight kilometres
south of Wisemans Ferry. Its location is shown on Figure 1. The site is included within the Maroota
sector of Sydney
Regional Environmental Plan No 9
- Extractive Industry (Number 2). The objective of this plan is to protect a valuable sand resource in this
and other locations. The site is zoned Rural 1(b) under Baulkham
Hills Local Environmental Plan 2005. Extractive industry is permitted, with Council consent,
within this zone. The existing sand mining operation is located
on a site adjacent to the intersection of Old land covering approximately 79 hectares.
The proposal would now include 10 parcels following the addition of three, including
the former Maroota Meteorological Reserve site and its access roads and the removal of Lot
2 Dp555184. The area subject to sand extraction would now cover an area of approximately
85 hectares which is shown on Figure 2. The site is basically triangular in shape
with an additional rectangular portion located to the south east. The distance from the apex
of the triangle at the intersection of Wisemans Ferry Road and metres while the base of the triangle from
the junction with easterly corner measures some 1,300 metres. The Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
control
the use and development of land in New South proposal. The Act was amended in August 2005 by the
inclusion of Part 3A. The Minister for Planning is responsible for determining development
which has been declared to be major infrastructure under this part of the Act.
The Minister may declare a development to be a major project if defined in Schedule
1: Major Projects-Classes of Projects in State Environmental Planning
Policy (Major Projects). Group 2.7 in Schedule 1 includes extractive industries and the as a major project under the State Environmental
Planning Policy due to its scale and significance. The summary provides an overview of the proposal,
its benefits and its impacts. It is designed to provide enough basic information
to allow informed comment to be made without the need to examine the whole document
and the associated technical papers. Maroota Site 0 30 60 90 kilometres LOCATION
OF THE SITE Figure 1 OLD TELEGRAPH 0 1.0 Kilometres Scale THE SITE Figure 2 ROAD OLD NORTHERN ROAD HAERSES ROAD Sydney Regional Environmental
Plan 9 area boundary PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
4 The issues addressed in the EA and summarised
here are derived from a number of sources. These include the requirements of
the Director General of the Department of Planning and other relevant authorities,
the previous EIS, experience of operating the site and the Consent Orders of the Land and which the existing operations are conducted. The authorities raised a comprehensive range
of issues with no indication of priorities. As a result, each has been addressed in the document.
Specialist consultants have provided detailed studies in relation to the following: • geology and resource assessment; • noise; • air quality; • groundwater; • flora and fauna; • traffic and access; • cultural heritage; and • visual impacts. Existing Operations Sand extraction has been undertaken on part
of the site since the mid-1980s based on a number of Council consents. Following a long
series of discussions, an application covering most of the current site was determined
by Baulkham Hills Shire Council by the granting of consent with conditions on 16
December 1997. The consent excluded an area located in the centre of the site, then
known as the Maroota Trigonometrical Reserve, and its approach roads. The resulting
landform, following completion, would therefore have comprised two separate extraction
zones with a major elevated area remaining in the centre of the main part
of the site plus an additional area to the east. A third party filed a Class 1 Appeal against
the consent in March 1998. This was heard in the Land and The extraction has subsequently been operated
in compliance with Consent Orders 10064 of 1998 of the Land and administered by Baulkham Hills Shire Council.
The consent orders allow Council to amend the staging of the development and the depth
to which extraction can take place following application from the proponent.
Staging has been amended as a result of site related factors with the approval of Council
but two applications to amend the depth of extraction in response to continuing groundwater
monitoring have not been granted. Key conditions contained in the consent orders
include: • retention of the existing Trigonometrical Reserve
and hence sterilising a significant volume of extractable Tertiary sand; • limitation of the period of extraction to 30 years
from July 1998 (the endorsed date of consent); PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
5 • restriction of the maximum depth of extraction to
187 metres AHD subject to the outcomes of the Maroota Groundwater Study; • limitation of annual extraction of Tertiary sand from
the site to 400,000 tonnes of processed material; and • limitation of laden vehicle movements to a combined
total of 200 movements per day via the intersection of the haulage road
and The site is operated in compliance with these
and other conditions included in the consent orders administered by Baulkham Hills
Shire Council. The site is also operated in compliance with
the provisions of Environment Protection Licence 3407 under the Protection
of the Environment Operations Act 1997 administered by the Department of Environment and Conservation. Planning Context The main planning instruments applying
to the proposal are Baulkham Hills Local Environmental
Plan 2005, Baulkham Hills Shire Development Control Plan 16 – Extractive Industries 2004 and Sydney
Regional Environmental Plan 9 – Extractive Industry (Number 2) 1994. The site is included within the area
defined for inclusion in Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 9 which was introduced
to assist in the development of extractive resources located close to the Sydney Metropolitan area. The
plan takes precedence over local planning instruments. The site is zoned Rural 1(b) under Baulkham
Hills Local Environmental Plan 2005. Quarrying is permissible in this zone with development
consent. The proposal described in the EA generally complies with the requirements
of Baulkham
Hills Shire Development Control Plan 16. Relationship between Existing and Proposed Developments The present application seeks changes of
two kinds. First, these would amend the area over which the activity would be permitted
and, second, would change the depth to which extraction could be undertaken and
modify the resulting final landform on cessation. The proposal would entail extraction of Tertiary
sand and other materials from all the lots included in the current consent with the
addition of Lot 1 DP1013943 (formerly Maroota Trigonometrical Reserve 6739), adjacent Crown
Roads, Lot 2, DP752039 and DP223323 and the removal of Lot 2 DP555184. It is proposed to use the existing sand slurry
transport system, central wash plant and ancillary facilities such as the workshop,
weighbridge and office located on DP752025 in addition to the existing haul
roads on site. It is not proposed to increase output above the limit set out in the existing
consent (400,000 tonnes of processed material per year). As a result, the number
of trucks allowed to leave the site via the weighbridge on movements per day). (No trucks are allowed
to convey material from the extraction site across routine maintenance is taking place). There
would therefore be no change in the traffic impacts on the surrounding road network as
a result of the proposal. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
6 Extraction activities on the site including
rehabilitation are limited to a period of 30 years from 14 July 1998 (the endorsed date of consent).
It is not proposed to extend this period. The development application will seek a new
approval. This will require the surrender of the existing consent by the proponent and
the compliance of the development with a new set of approval conditions. The Proposed Development Development consent is sought for the proposal
including: • staged extraction of Tertiary sand, friable sandstone,
clay and gravel to within two metres of the wet weather high groundwater
table (nominally 181 metres AHD) with no extraction within buffer zones and perimeter
setbacks as defined in the EA; • loading and transport of the extracted Tertiary sand
via articulated vehicles to the existing sand slurry plant located at the
northern end of the site. Other extracted material would be stockpiled for later reuse
as backfill or for transport to the central wash plant on • staged clearance of vegetation within those areas
designated for extraction as defined in the EA; • transport of Tertiary sand as a slurry via the existing
pipeline to the central wash plant on • processing and stockpiling of Tertiary sand at the
existing central wash plant in accordance with the existing consent for
this operation which allows such processing for the life of the extraction on the former
Trigonometrical Reserve site; • importation and processing of clean material for recycling
up to a maximum of 20 laden trucks per day; • return of wash water via the existing pipeline and
disposal of tailings from the processed Tertiary sand into sedimentation
ponds located on the site of the proposal; • transport of the product off-site in accordance with
the existing consent; • use of the existing dam on Lot 167 DP752039 to receive
and detain runoff from the extraction area and return clean water to
the sand slurry transport system and the existing dam on area; and • rehabilitation of extracted areas on the site of the
proposal to create an integrated, continuous landform across all extracted
areas as the basis for productive future use. Extraction Operations The development would be undertaken in four
main stages requiring approximately five years each to complete. Extraction would
continue as currently planned under the existing consent until a new approval is
received. Some of the activities described under Phase One could be undertaken under the existing
consent. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
7 Phase One (2006 – 2010) - continuation of extraction westward from
Area B; - extraction eastward from the haul road
(overburden backfilled into Area B); - construction of Pond 11; - completion of Pond 9; - partial rehabilitation of Pond 5; - continuing extraction of the area adjacent
to - extraction on Lot 214 DP752039 and Lot1
DP34599; - rehabilitation (planting) in the area of
former ponds 3, 4 and 6; Phase Two (2011 – 2015) - extraction southwards from Area A; - construction of Pond 12; - extraction on Lot 2 DP570966; - rehabilitation of area adjacent to - overburden backfilled into extracted areas
to the south; - rehabilitation of Pond 11; - extraction to the south; Phase Three (2016 – 2020) - continuation of extraction to the south; - backfilling of clay overburden into extracted
areas to the north and south; - completion of Pond 13; - continuation of extraction on Lot 2 DP570966 - rehabilitation of northern section of the
northern extraction area; - rehabilitation of the western part of the
southern extraction area. Phase Four (2021 – 2024) - continuation of extraction southwards; - backfilling of clay overburden into extraction
to the north; - continuation of extraction in the southern
area; - extraction on Lot 1 DP1013943, Lots 1 and
2 DP1063296 and Lot 2 DP570966; - construction of Pond 14; - rehabilitation of southern extraction area; - rehabilitation of northern extraction area; - rehabilitation of ponds leaving one to
drain each catchment; - completion of land reformation and landscape
planting; - removal of all fixed infrastructure and
formation of final land form. The overall staging of the development
is shown on Figure
3. Processing and Product Transport All Tertiary sand would be transferred to
articulated dump trucks to transport the material via established on-site haul roads to the
existing plant located at the northern end of the site. Here it would be mixed with water and
transported as slurry by pipeline some 1.5 kilometres to the central wash plant located
on returned to the site for settlement in a
series of clay lined basins prior to recirculation from the clean water pond at the lowest point
on the system and subsequent reuse. 0 500 Metres Scale OVERALL PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT Figure 3 2010-20 OLD NORTHERN ROAD 2015-2025 2006-10 2010-15 Tertiary Sand 2006-10 Friable Sandstone 2007-09 Tertiary Sand Location of Slurry Plant Extraction completed - rehabilitation
underway Areas to be capped and rehabilitated
- currently ponds Area extracted - to be used as
detention basin Areas for future extraction and
rehabilitation Areas currently working / almost
completed Existing internal haul road Temporary access Note: Work will continue under
current approval 2010 -15 PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
9 Product is currently trucked from the central
plant and all sales are made from the weighbridge on turning either left to the intersection with
Hill or right along of trips on these routes is approximately
equal. It is proposed that sand extracted from the
markets as the current operation and the
same transport routes would be used. The number of truck movements would remain within
the currently approved limit of a total of 200 laden trucks per day (400 truck movements). Site Services All necessary site services are available
and no augmentation is required. Workforce and Hours of Operation The current workforce would remain at 20
to 22 staff. Truck drivers, either permanent staff or contracted or employed by others would
pick up loads from the central process plant on The hours of operation would be in accordance
with those applying to Lot 198 containing the central process plant and the weighbridge: • 05.45 hours Monday to Saturday – gates open
to allow entry of vehicles to the site; • 06.00 to 07.00 hours Monday to Saturday (excluding
public holidays) – 30 truck movements (15 loaded vehicles) may enter
or leave the site; • 07.00 to 18.00 hours Monday to Saturday (excluding
public holidays) – extraction, transportation and processing or running
of machinery for maintenance purposes permitted; and • no extraction, transportation or processing
on Sundays and public holidays. Life of the Proposal Extraction rates at the tonnes per year over the past six years.
This is not expected to change although annual rates may vary from depending on market conditions.
Extraction of some 5,335,000 tonnes of material at these rates would require
between 21 and 26 years to complete. This is consistent with the existing consent
(30 years from November 1998). Management of Waste The overall waste management objective is
to minimise the generation of waste, maximise recycling and ensure that wastes
are managed in a way that minimises impacts on the environment. Trees, shrubs and other plants stripped during
site clearing would be reused during rehabilitation to provide a source of seed,
organic matter and refuge for fauna. All overburden would be used in rehabilitation
of the previously extracted area or adjacent parts of the site. Tailings, the
fine clays and silts removed from the sand during washing would be disposed of in tailings
ponds on the site. General waste would be managed at the workshop
and offices on provides separate receptacles for paper,
aluminium, glass, plastic and general domestic PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
10 waste with the recyclables (paper, aluminium,
glass and plastic) collected by a licensed disposal contractor. Sewage treatment and disposal is provided
by an enviro-cycle
type
plant. It is not proposed to install any additional office
facilities or amenities on the site. Waste oil and grease is collected and stored
in a bunded tank and periodically removed by a licensed oil recycling contractor. Building
waste and putrescible material is also removed from site on a regular basis and
this procedure would continue. Rehabilitation and The final landform of the extraction, the location of commercially
available resource (both Tertiary sand and friable sandstone) and the volume of overburden,
mainly clay, available for re-contouring the extracted areas. Sand has been extracted
from part of the site to the depth allowed in the existing consent and part of this area
has been rehabilitated. These areas will not be reworked. Most of the area is expected to be reclaimed
to Class 3 agricultural land suitable for grazing and improvement for pasture. Rehabilitation
would comprise the return of the stored topsoil and the progressive revegetation
of the site. Techniques to be used have been based on several sources: Urban
Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook (Department of Conservation and Land
Management 1992); Managing Urban Stormwater (Landcom 2004); and
Best
Practice Environmental Management in Mining – Rehabilitation and Revegetation
(Environment
Protection Authority 1995). A comprehensive rehabilitation strategy including
a biodiversity offset strategy would be prepared as part of the revised environmental
management plan for the site. Environmental Impacts and Safeguards Specialist studies were undertaken to assist
in the understanding of the environment of the site and its surroundings which together
with the experience of operating the site over the past six years has enabled the proposed development
to be designed to avoid or minimise undesirable impacts. Potential impacts
and proposed or existing safeguards are summarised in the following sections. Land Use Land uses in the surrounding area include
agriculture, extractive industries, forestry, national park, nature conservation and water
reserve. Agricultural activities include orchards, market gardens and grazing undertaken
mainly on the plateau along the Maroota ridge. Sand extraction now constitutes a major land
use in the Maroota area with this activity protected by designation in the Sydney
Regional Environmental Plan 9 – Extractive Industries (Department of Urban
Affairs and Planning 1994). Sand mining has been undertaken in the Maroota area since 1983
and will become a source of increasing importance as sources in other parts of the
metropolitan area reach the end of their active lives. The Agricultural Land Classification
Atlas (NSW
Agriculture 1995) maps the site as Class 3 land. This is well suited to grazing and
pasture improvement and may be cropped or cultivated in rotation with pasture. Soil
conservation or drainage works may be required due to erosion hazard and soil structural
breakdown on this class of land. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
11 The majority of the site to be quarried would
be rehabilitated with grasses on the flatter slopes and local native plants on the batters
and steeper slopes. Groundwater Three separate aquifers can be identified,
although the extent of their hydrogeological separation or, conversely, interconnection,
is sometimes uncertain. These aquifer units are: • Maroota sand; • eluvial/weathered profile of the underlying Hawkesbury
sandstone; and, • Hawkesbury sandstone. The more significant of these are the Maroota
sand and the deeper Hawkesbury sandstone. The following potential impacts of sand extraction
have been investigated: • reduced groundwater availability to users; • reduced flow to streams; • increased turbidity in streams; and • lowering of the water table. None of these are expected to occur as a
result of the proposal which is expected to lead to an increased potential for groundwater
recharge to the deep aquifer with benefit to nearby users. No mitigation measures,
in addition to those in place and reported in the annual management plan, would be necessary. Surface Water Surface water flows are directed to a number
of large detention basins which are part of the process system employed at the site.
These allow the silt in the water, returned from the wash plant on located in the lowest part of the site. The
clean water is returned from here to the slurry plant and the central process plant. The site where sand extraction has taken
place to date is inwardly draining due to a combination of topography and the effect
of the peripheral bunds constructed as part of the project. No surface water is therefore
discharged beyond its boundaries. The whole site can therefore be considered to be a
detention basin capable of accommodating far in excess of the runoff from the 100 year
ARI time of concentration event. The site, including Lot 2 DP555184 can be
divided into three catchments. Based on containing all runoff from the 100 year storm
event, the following basins would be required on completion of the proposal. Northern catchment 16 hectares 8,600 cubic
metres Southern catchment 52 hectares 24,000 cubic
metres Eastern catchment 29 hectares 12,600 cubic
metres The impact of current operations on catchment
flows is minimal and this would be expected to continue. Surface runoff would
only occur during high intensity storms when the infiltration capacity of the soils is
exceeded. The dams and creeks in the vicinity of the site are known to be groundwater dependent
and are not expected to be influenced by PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
12 any changes in catchment conditions. In addition,
extraction of overburden and the underlying Tertiary sand is expected to improve
groundwater recharge. That part of the site (most of the eastern
catchment) potentially discharging to the headwaters of Little Cattai Creek makes up
less than 0.2 percent of the total catchment and would therefore not be expected to have
any impact on the quality or quantity of surface water discharged to the The northern and southern catchments drain
to existing detention basins as part of the onsite surface water management system while the
eastern catchment discharges to the natural drainage system via a large existing
dam on Lot 2 DP555184 which is not included in the proposal. Soils The soils on site are highly erodible under
concentrated flows. Erosion and sediment controls have therefore been proposed to
manage drainage and minimise the area of soil exposed to surface water flows. Controls
would include: • provision of buffers and installation of silt fences
where appropriate to prevent sediment transport to adjoining land; • minimising the area of disturbance by only clearing
areas immediately prior to extraction within each stage and progressive
rehabilitation of the completed area; • diversion of upslope drainage away from disturbed
areas; • diversion of sediment laden runoff to sediment basins;
and • regular inspection and maintenance of sediment controls. Noise Noise would be generated on those parts of
the site where extraction and subsequent rehabilitation is taking place. This would
vary depending on the location of these activities at any one time. Noise levels
would be similar to those currently generated and would provide the basis for the assessment
of future noise levels. The focus for the noise assessment was the
nearest non-project related sensitive receptors adjacent to the site. These are mainly located
on the north-eastern side of Old Northern Road. All are protected from site generated
noise by acoustic mounds and one residence is at a considerable distance from
current operations. Two residences are located close to the western side of the
site: one at the intersection of and The responsibility for the control of noise
emissions in NSW is vested in local councils and the Department of Environment and Conservation.
The Environment Protection Authority (now part of the Department of Environment
and Conservation) released an Industrial Noise Policy in January 2000. This provides
a framework and process for deriving noise criteria for consents and licences that
regulate premises scheduled under the Protection of the Environment Operations
Act 1997. The
Act. The noise assessment comprised three components: • operational noise impacts at local sensitive receivers
in the vicinity of PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
13 • traffic noise impacts resulting from the proposal
at locations on and Old Northern Road; and • cumulative noise impacts at various selected locations
taking account of the proposal and other adjacent sand extraction
operations. Each of these assessments was based on operational
and traffic scenarios which represented a worst case condition to provide
a comparison with criteria designed to manage industrial noise emissions. Noise levels during operation marginally
exceed the respective noise criterion at three locations. These relate to minor exceedances
of the night time criterion during the period from 06.00 to 07.00 hours during periods
when particular meteorological conditions were prevailing (north-west wind or temperature
inversion). One receiver is predicted to experience a minor exceedance (1dBA) during
operational hours. However, this is not likely to occur in practice as the operational
scenario tested assumes that all equipment is working simultaneously. Lower received noise
levels would therefore be experienced at the various assessment locations. Existing day time traffic noise levels are
within the Department of Environment and Conservation’s recommended assessment
criterion of 60 dBA at all assessment locations and the worst case predicted increases in
peak daytime traffic noise levels are 1.2 dBA. However, existing night time traffic noise
levels exceed the recommended assessment criterion of 55 dBA at five locations. The
worst case predicted increase in peak night time traffic noise levels is 1 dBA. Cumulative noise emissions for the proposal
and adjoining extraction operations during non-adverse meteorological conditions are
below the relevant acceptable amenity criteria for industrial noise (non-transport
related) during daytime and night time periods at all assessment locations. Air Quality Dust generation would be the principle air
quality issue on the main activities likely to generate dust during
the operation of the proposed extraction areas would include: • topsoil stripping and overburden removal; • ripping and excavation of friable sandstone; • vehicles travelling on unsealed surfaces; • screening of the raw feed material on site or at the
wash plant; • loading and unloading the raw feed and products to
trucks and stockpiles; and • wind erosion of stockpiles and exposed unpaved areas. The quantity of dust generated by each activity
has been established by reference to emission factors developed both locally and
by the US EPA. Dust concentrations and deposition rates
resulting from extraction operations for existing and proposed developments at the nearest
residential receptor included predictions of: • maximum 24-hour average PM10 concentration; PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
14 • annual average PM10 concentration; • annual average Total Suspended Particulate concentration;
and • annual average dust deposition. Predicted emissions are not expected to differ
from those currently experienced. Air quality monitoring undertaken over the past
six years has indicated that emissions generally remain below the annual average
dust deposition goal of the Department of Environment and Conservation of 4g/m2/month. It is unlikely that future emissions
would exceed the applicable air quality goal
even in combination with future PM10 and
total suspended particulate concentrations generated
by other local operations. Flora and Fauna A total of four vegetation communities occur
on site, including Shale Sandstone Transition Forest, regrowth vegetation. Vegetation in the cleared
areas is dominated by weeds and is not considered to be a native community. The condition of the The regrowth vegetation areas are also in
moderate to poor condition. Two threatened species of plant, Tetratheca glandulosa and Grevillea
parviflora subsp
parviflora
were recorded during detailed surveys of the
site and potential habitat exists for Pimelea curviflora subsp curviflora,
Caladenia tesselata, Acacia gordonii and Persoonia hirsuta. The condition of the fauna habitats in the
while those in the habitats that are in poor condition. The
threatened Glossy-black Cockatoo was recorded on site. However, the species would only
use the site as a marginal foraging area and would not depend on its habitat resources. Impact assessments as required under
the Threatened
Species Conservation Act 1995 and Environment Protection
and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 were carried out for the Shale Sandstone Transition Forest Endangered
Ecological Community, five threatened species of plant, microchiropteran bats (as
a group) and nocturnal birds (as a group). The assessments concluded that the proposed sand
extraction and rehabilitation was unlikely to have significant impact on threatened
species, population or communities. Overall, the proposal would result in the
clearing of approximately 5.2 hectares of Shale Ridgetop Woodland with the associated loss
of flora and fauna habitats. This is not considered to be a significant impact on
either local or regional ecosystems. Neither would the proposed extension of sand mining
activities at to significantly affect any threatened species,
population or community. A biodiversity offset strategy, based on the principles
set out in Appendix 2 of Guidelines for Biodiversity Certification of Environmental
Planning Instruments; Working Draft (Department of Environment and Climate Change 2007) would
be included in a revised Rehabilitation Plan for the site. Cultural Heritage No Aboriginal sites were identified during
the survey. One European site was located during the
site investigations. This comprised a simple farm shed which, due to its age, exhibited
potential heritage significance. However, this PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
15 does not meet the threshold where it would
be considered significant under any of the criteria established by the NSW Heritage
Office. The site does not therefore qualify for any additional assessment or listing on any local
or State registers. The Maroota Trigonometrical Station is typical
of the standard design used throughout NSW and is very common. It is less than 50
years old and as such is not a heritage item under the NSW Heritage Act. Traffic and Access Traffic growth on both three years on the former and remained static
on the latter. Heavy vehicles, defined as articulated trucks with three to six axles
and B-Doubles similar to those commonly used for the transport of sand, make up nine percent
of the total on seven percent on both these roads with a bias towards northbound
traffic in the morning with the reverse occurring in the evening. The proposal would not generate more laden
trips from the central area on at present and would remain within the permitted
total of 200 laden trips per day for all PF Formation operations in Baulkham Hills. Future
operations could generate an additional 20 laden truck trips per day if the consent
is extended to include the processing of materials for recycling from sites other
than the developments. In addition, the future development
of maximum of 10 laden trips per day over the
period from 2006. The performance of the local road network
and the intersections used by the sitegenerated traffic has been assessed using growth factors
for future traffic. The assessment indicated that the traffic generated by the
proposal would have no significant impacts on the road network or the performance of
the intersections. No changes to these items are therefore required. Visual Impacts The proposed development would remove vegetation,
topsoil, overburden and the available Tertiary Sand and friable sandstone
resource from defined areas on the site. This would result in remoulding of the existing
landform and, during active extraction, the exposure of substantial parts of the area.
Progressive rehabilitation would return the site to a vegetated state as quickly as possible. Visual mitigation measures such as bunds
and vegetated setbacks have been implemented along the periphery of the site
and parts of the site where extraction is complete have been reformed and seeded with
local native species. The proposal would lead to modification of
the topography of the site with a lowering of its central and highest part. This would
require removal of the remaining vegetation on the present skyline which would be replaced
during rehabilitation. However, this is only visible from a small number of locations
with public access. These are along Haerses Road and a short section of road) and will soon become part of a recently
approved major sand extraction operation resulting in the elimination of public access.
Views from considerable distance, are fragmented and
will be interrupted by sand extraction activities in the foreground. Views of proposed extraction areas on the
would be limited by the topography and existing
vegetation which will remain. These would be reinforced by new bunds included
in the proposal which would remove any views of the works. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
16 Hazard State Environmental Planning
Policy 33 – Hazardous and Offensive Development requires that the safety and pollution impacts of
a proposal are addressed at an early stage of the development application process. The policy
provides a procedure which links the permissibility of the proposal to its safety
and pollution control performance. The application of the screening procedure
set out in Applying Sate Environmental Planning Policy 33 (Department of Urban
Affairs and Planning 1994) indicated that as no hazardous materials as defined by the code
were stored on site, the development is not classified as hazardous and the Environmental
Planning Policy does not apply. Socio-economic Effects The includes a number of other similar sand extraction
projects. Together these result in cumulative impacts relating to the nuisance
experienced from traffic, particularly large trucks passing through a small rural community,
dust and, in some cases, noise. A small number of residents in adjacent properties
may also be affected by the direct impacts of a single extraction operation. In the case
of the limited as the majority of adjacent residents
are separated from the site by the roads along its periphery. Jointly and separately, sand extraction operations
inject resources into the local economy in the form of royalties to the land owners,
providing jobs both directly and indirectly and supporting local services. These are all
benefits to the local community. The activities of the industry are controlled by a wide range
of measures which aim to manage the environment so that all established criteria
are met. Cumulative Impacts There are currently three sand extraction
proposals at various stages in the development process in the Maroota area which could result
in cumulative impacts. These are: • Sand extraction on Lots 1 and 2 DP 547255, existing process plant on Lot 196 DP 752025.
This development has a life of 18 years from the date of consent and is currently
underway. Production from the existing quarry and its extension is not to exceed
495,000 tonnes per year. • Sand extraction on Lot 198 DP 752025, development application supported by an EIS
was recently approved by Baulkham Hills Shire Council. Production would be
expected to average 35,000 tonnes per year over a ten year life. • Sand extraction on Lot 170 DP 664767, Lots A and B
DP 407341 and Lots 176 and 177 DP 752039, EA was recently approved by the Minister
for Planning. The development would have a life of 25 years with an annual extraction
rate of 250,000 tonnes. The proposal would use empty trucks returning to Lot 196 DP
752025 to transport the extracted material to the process plant. The annual production
rate on with the approved maximum of 495,000 tonnes
per year. Each of these proposals was assessed in terms
of its cumulative impact in relation to existing and future development in the Maroota
area. The existing operations at the would result in no change to environmental
impacts with the exception of changes to the final topography of the site, any additional
cumulative impacts can be considered to be minimal. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
17 Justification of the Proposal Biophysical Impacts The impacts of the proposal would be similar
to those associated with existing extraction operations with the exception of visual impacts
resulting from the changes to the topography of the site. However, the resulting
impacts would be limited as there are relatively few views of the centre of the
site from areas with public access. Overall, the impacts of the proposal would be minimal
with the adoption of the proposed safeguards and operational procedures. Economic Effects High quality construction sand is a limited
resource in the located relatively close to the main markets.
As a number of large sources of supply become exhausted over the next ten years
or are subject to increasingly stringent environmental controls ( sand will become increasingly valuable to
the NSW economy. Alternative sources are at considerably greater distances from the main
markets resulting in increased transport costs and environmental impacts. The increased volume of material available
for extraction as a result of the approval of the proposal would result in the continuing
employment of the 20 to 22 full-time employees at Maroota. This would offer long
term employment security over the next 25 years. Continuing activity at the product transport industry in addition to
equipment supply and maintenance. The development would also make a contribution
to economic development in the local community through the purchase of services
and various consumables. Social Impacts The proposed sand extraction would service
the same market as previous operations undertaken by PF Formation at Maroota, would
employ the same number of staff and use the same fixed and ancillary plant. Negative
effects on local employment and the economy are therefore unlikely. Socio-economic benefits of the proposal include
the continuation of local employment, continuing supply of high quality sand to
the effects to the local and regional economy. Sustainability The precautionary principle has been applied
by reliance on comprehensive scientific data throughout the planning and assessment
of the proposal leading to the identification of mitigation measures and
environmental safeguards. Wherever a potential impact has been identified, mitigation
measures have been proposed to reduce any impacts as far as is practicable. The proposal would provide access to a large
volume of high quality sand, which would not otherwise be accessible without a major
change to environmental impacts at the site and on the surrounding area. Any substitution
of sand from other sources to compensate for the sterilisation of the material available
at environmental impacts. The proposal would
have long term benefits for future generations by providing a secure resource
close to market with a minimal environmental impact. PF Formation Environmental Assessment DFA Consultants Page
18 The principle of conservation of biological
diversity and ecological integrity has been considered throughout the assessment process.
Access to a large mass of Tertiary sand close to the centre of the site will require
the removal of a small remnant of Shale/Sandstone Transition Forest ( Seed has been collected from this community
over the past three years and has been used in the site rehabilitation implemented
to date. This process will continue and a large stock of seed stored for future use. This
would be used to recreate, as far as possible, a similar community to that previously established
on the site to ensure that no net loss of native vegetation occurs. The value of environmental resources on and
adjacent to the site is determined by a large number of factors. These include the
extent of detailed investigations and studies and planning and design of mitigation measures
to prevent any irreparable damage to these resources. Regular monitoring of the
existing development is undertaken on the these activities has been included in the
proponent’s assessment of the proposal. Alternatives The only realistic alternative to the proposal
is the continuation of the current consent which would result in the sterilisation of
substantial volumes of extractible sand. As the proposal would result in minimal environmental
impacts on the biophysical and economic environments, this approach is not considered
to be effective or realistic. The proposal would lead to the removal of a small area
of a protected woodland community and an adjustment to the local topography which
would have limited visual impacts. The removal of the former Trigonometrical Reserve
site would have no heritage impacts as the existing concrete pillar is less than 50
years old and is of a common type. Need for the Proposal The predicted demand for medium to coarse
grained sand of the type available at supply from the region of 22.5 million tonnes
over the same period. The potential shortfall of three million tonnes would need to be
satisfied by increasing imports or by increasing production within the region (Department
of Mineral Resources 2001). In the medium term (2010 to 2020) the predicted
demand for medium to coarse grained sand is expected to increase to 30.6 million
tonnes. There will be no dominant secure supply of this material in the scheme, expected in 2010. Current sand supplies
from Maroota and elsewhere in the region are approximately 800,000 tonnes per
year. The remainder of the annual requirement of three million tonnes would
need to be derived from elsewhere, and, as a result, sand produced from sources such as
Maroota will have an increasing importance in supplying the There is clearly a need for additional sources
of medium to coarse grained sand within the price due to the additional transport costs
involved and result in additional environmental impacts as new sources are exploited. It
is therefore important to enable the maximum available resource to be obtained from existing
sources of sand in the while ensuring that appropriate environmental
standards are maintained. The new proposal at |
|
Enter supporting content here
|